Aston Villa transfer news on Quentin Merlin

Aston Villa are keen on signing Nantes left-back Quentin Merlin, according to The Sunday Mirror (05/06, p72), via Birmingham Mail.

The lowdown

Steven Gerrard has already completed four signings for the summer transfer window – Diego Carlos, Philippe Coutinho, Robin Olsen and Boubacar Kamara – but his recruitment drive shows no signs of stopping.

Indeed, The Athletic's Gregg Evans reported after the capture of Kamara that a left-back is on the agenda for the 42-year-old.

Merlin has been with Nantes since the age of 11 but only made his Ligue 1 debut this season. He would go on to start 21 of his team's top-flight matches, making seven more substitute appearances.

The 20-year-old, who can also operate as a left midfielder, is contracted to Nantes until 2026 and is valued at £4.5m by Transfermarkt.

The latest

The report from The Sunday Mirror (via Birmingham Mail) claimed that Merlin grabbed Gerrard's attention during a Ligue 1 scouting mission a few weeks ago.

The Villa manager travelled to the Stade Velodrome for a match between Marseille and Nantes on 20 April, intending to watch Kamara, but Merlin reportedly impressed him too.

The verdict

Merlin, who has been labelled a 'serious talent' by Jacek Kulig, looks like he could be a strong back-up to Lucas Digne and a potential long-term starter, with Matt Targett's Villa Park future uncertain.

The French youngster ranked in the 86th percentile among full-backs in the top five European leagues for shot-creating actions in 2021/22, notching three assists in addition to his two goals (via FBRef). With high volumes of progressive carries and dribbles too, he's clearly very active up and down the left flank.

He may only have played 20 minutes on the night that Gerrard was in attendance, but that speaks to the strength of his cameo against Marseille. Merlin won three of the four duels that he contested, completed two dribbles and was successful with eight of his 10 passes (via SofaScore).

He also shone against Paris Saint-Germain in February, scoring what sports journalist Josh Bunting called an 'incredible' goal, and he looks like an astute replacement for Targett if the latter has played his last game in a Villa shirt.

In other news, Matt Maher lays out his Villa transfer expectations

West Brom plot move for Sean Longstaff

West Bromwich Albion failed to secure promotion back into the Premier League next season so it will now be up to Steve Bruce to put them in a better position to challenge again and now another transfer target has been linked with a move to The Hawthorns.

What’s the latest?

Football League World reported on Tuesday that West Brom were competing with Watford to secure the signature of Newcastle United’s Sean Longstaff who was initially out of contract at the end of the season.

The report suggested that his current club on Tyneside had offered him a new contract with the player facing many for next season with opportunities to gain extra game time.

However, with the midfielder now signing a new contract on Wednesday afternoon, it seems unlikely a deal will be forced through.

Should a move ever occur though, they could land a big upgrade.

Better than Livermore

Bruce is no stranger to Longstaff after managing him during his days at Newcastle United so will be more than knowledgeable on how to deploy him.

Although Longstaff’s game time has been limited in the Premier League this season, he still offers more on the pitch than Jake Livermore in the glimpses he has given for this current club.

According to SofaScore, has scored one goal and contributed one assist, was successful in the majority of his dribbles (55%) and made 2.3 tackles on average per game in 24 appearances.

The Magpies midfielder scored more goals, won more ground and aerial duels combined (50%), made more tackles and has a better pass accuracy (81%) on average per game in 13 fewer appearances than Livermore at West Brom this season.

The £23k-per-week ace who was hailed “immense” by Chronicle Live journalist Charlie Bennett, was chased in January by Everton but the bid was rejected ahead of contract talks with Newcastle after the negotiations broke down when Bruce was in charge almost two years ago.

Ultimately, if Bruce could secure the signing of Longstaff it would be a major coup for West Brom and add a fresh perspective in their midfield set up.

AND in other news: In talks: West Brom on the verge of landing 1st summer signing, Bruce will love him

Man City transfer claim emerges

Manchester City have seen many players come and go at the Etihad Stadium over the past few years, usually for significant sums of money.

As things stand in their current season, the Citizens are four games away from potentially securing the Premier League title once again.

Should the club manage to do that, it would be the only trophy they would get their hands on this season after getting knocked out of the Carabao Cup, FA Cup and, this week, the Champions League.

Now that the summer transfer window is on the horizon, it seems as though a big clue has emerged regarding what sort of business could be done behind the scenes at the Etihad this time around.

What’s the news?

According to a recent report from The Telegraph, City are preparing to “refresh their squad this summer amid hope Pep Guardiola will extend his contract with the club.”

It has also been claimed that City “are expected to sign the Norway striker Erling Haaland from Borussia Dortmund for the £63m release clause in his contract regardless of what happens with the manager’s longer-term future.”

The report added that the Citizens “want to bring in another midfielder, with Fernandinho due to leave at the end of the season, and doubts surrounding the futures of at least five other senior players.”

Focusing on their potential swoop for Haaland, the fact that City have missed more big chances (58) than any other team in the Premier League this season shows that they could do with having a clinical striker like the Norwegian in their line-up.

Having scored 85 goals in 87 games for the Bundesliga giants, it’s safe to say that the 21-year-old could be a crucial signing for City if he can replicate that same sort of consistent goalscoring form in England.

Taking all this into account, it seems as though the hierarchy at the Etihad could be set for a busy summer period in terms of securing deals for players potentially moving into and out of the club once again.

This would surely be great news for City supporters who will be hoping that whatever business gets done in the summer will put their team in with a great chance of winning every competition in which they are involved next season and beyond.

In other news: Behind-the-scenes transfer development emerges, it’s bad news for Man City

England bank on Baby Boom to reinvigorate long-term Test prospects

The Test readiness of England’s rookies is perhaps secondary to the sense of purpose that their inclusions project

Andrew Miller at Lord's08-Aug-20181:47

Pope gets the nod for England, but who’ll miss out?

The kids are alright, you know. For the fourth time in 2018 alone, and for the fifth time since the selection of Haseeb Hameed on the last tour of India in November 2016, England have plumped for youth over experience, excitement over stability, the bold approach over the same old narrative with interchangeably seasoned campaigners.At the age of 20 years and 219 days, Surrey’s Ollie Pope will bat at No.4 for England in the Lord’s Test – a position that effectively leaves him man-marking one of the game’s all-time great batsmen in India’s captain, Virat Kohli, the scorer of 200 formidable runs in last week’s Edgbaston Test.With just 15 first-class matches under his belt, Pope slots into England’s Test history as their third-youngest specialist batsman behind Denis Compton (19 years and 83 days) and Hameed (19 years and 269 days), and does so in the wake of his Surrey team-mate and fellow 20-year old, Sam Curran, being named as Man of the Match for a precocious allround display in the first Test.Throw into the mix the bloodings of Mason Crane (20 years and 320 days) at Sydney in January, and Dom Bess (20 years and 306 days) for the Pakistan Tests in May and June, and is clear that the only thing being fast-tracked more quickly than young English talent is a sense of revolution from the new national selector, Ed Smith, who whiled away his time during England’s nets session by patrolling the Nursery Ground outfield with phone glued to ear and with shades and rolled-up shirtsleeves transmitting a stockbroker’s air of urgency.What could possibly go wrong? Well, everything and nothing, in the opinion of England’s captain, Joe Root (who was himself a grizzled 22-year-old when he made his own Test bow at Nagpur in 2012-13). Before this sudden baby boom, England had chosen just 19 under-21s in their first 140 years of Test history – most recently Steven Finn as a last-minute replacement on the tour of Bangladesh in 2010. But with the team’s current Test record perhaps as erratic as it has been in a generation, there is arguably a perverse prudence to such an abrupt change of strategy.”If you’re old enough, you’re good enough,” Root said. “A lot of the selections of late have been quite bold, we’re not shy of being a little bit brave and doing things slightly differently. It’s worked out for us so far.””I think when you give exciting young talents responsibility, they tend to surprise you,” he added. “We’ve seen that so far. The challenge for them moving forward is to try and sustain that and not put too much pressure on themselves and too much expectation on them to deliver on a really consistent basis.”Ollie Pope and Sam Curran warm up ahead of training•Getty ImagesThe issue of youth and renewal is one that cuts to the core of everything in English cricket at present. The question of whether the likes of Pope and Curran are truly ready for the step-up in class is perhaps secondary to the sense of purpose that their inclusions project.Much as was the case with Adil Rashid’s recall at Edgbaston (and maybe, if you want to extrapolate even further, the ongoing mayhem that is The Hundred), the noses that get put out of joint by the ECB’s sudden predilection for thinking outside the box are less important than those outside the game’s usual confines who get wind of this disruption to the status quo, and poke their noses in for a first sniff of the action.Certainly Root was at pains to make it clear that the door is not closed to county performers who earn their recognition through the more traditional formula of runs and wickets over time. But, tellingly, he also seemed less interested in immediate dividends, even with a series as important as a five-Test rubber against India on the line. The long game is what really matters as England attempt to reboot their red-ball fortunes.”I think we’ve got to be really realistic that these guys are exciting young players and they will do some very good stuff,” said Root. “It might not all happen straight away and we have to be a little bit patient with that.” Join us for the ride, in other words, and invest in these guy’s stories. Whatever transpires, it is unlikely to be dull.Even India’s captain seemed rather engaged by Pope’s tale. “We want to try and knock him over as early as possible, but on a larger front, I am happy for him,” Kohli said. “As a cricketer I understand how important it is. I will tell him to enjoy the occasion, and not get too many runs!”The prospect of Pope having his credentials scrutinised by the best batsman in the world may be daunting, but it is not as if England’s rookies are being thrown into the fray without a serious support network behind them. In Alastair Cook, James Anderson and Stuart Broad – not to mention Root himself, whose 6000 Test runs are still only the start of what he could achieve – this team’s senior pros are among the most senior ever to have played the game.”We’ve got some very good experienced players around them so they can learn and mould their games at the highest level,” said Root. “For young guys coming in, that’s exciting for this team, and for people around it, seeing a young man in Sam performing how he did last week with a real bright future, it’s exciting for English cricket. That should fill a lot of other lads around the country with a huge amount of confidence.”And if the beauty of Test cricket lies in its narrative, then what could be more beautiful than these kids-turned-veterans, looking back in 15 years’ time on the priceless nuggets of wisdom that they received first-hand in their earliest outings? It may be wildly out of kilter with everything that English cricket has preached about Test cricket in the course of its first 990-odd engagements. But since the turn of the year, there’s been a turning of the page. And are you not entertained already?

Sri Lanka's shortest innings after electing to bat

Stats highlights from the first day’s play in Pallekele, where the hosts were bowled out for 117 in just 34.2

Bharath Seervi26-Jul-201634.2 Number of overs that Sri Lanka’s first innings lasted, which is their shortest after electing to bat. Before this, they had lasted 38.4 overs, bowled for 95 against South Africa in Cape Town in 2000-01.1 Number of lower totals for Sri Lanka against Australia at home, than the first-innings 117. They were bowled out for 105 in Galle in 2011. Tuesday’s total is the lowest total by any team in Pallekele. Sri Lanka themselves had previously made 174 against Australia in 2011.22.30 Test average of Sri Lanka’s top three batsmen at home since July 2015, which is the lowest among all teams. In 36 innings, their top-three has managed only two centuries and one half-century.10.50 Sri Lanka’s average opening partnership in home Tests since July 2015 – again, the worst among all teams. In 12 innings, only once have their openers put on more than 50.2003 The last time Sri Lanka fielded two or more debutants in the same Test. Sri Lanka handed out debut caps to Dhananjaya de Silva and Lakshan Sandakan on Tuesday. Against New Zealand in Colombo (PSS) in 2003, Kaushal Lokuarachchi and Prabath Nissanka made their Test debuts. De Silva’s first scoring shot was a six, which makes him the first Sri Lanka player to start off his Test career with a six.

Players getting off the mark in their Test career with a six
Player Team Against Venue Date
Eric Freeman Aus Ind Brisbane 1/19/1968
Carlisle Best WI Eng Kingston 2/21/1986
Keith Dabengwa Zim NZ Bulawayo 8/15/2005
Dale Richards WI Ban Kingstown 7/9/2009
Shafiul Islam Ban Ind Chittagong 1/17/2010
Jahurul Islam Ban Eng Dhaka 3/20/2010
Al-Amin Hossain Ban SL Dhaka 1/27/2014
Mark Craig NZ WI Kingston 6/8/2014
Dhananjaya de Silva SL Aus Pallekele 7/26/2016

1 This is the first Test in Sri Lanka in which both teams’ openers were dismissed for single-digit scores in the first innings. Overall, there have been 19 such Tests, the last of which was at Wanderers in 2006-07 between India and South Africa.2006 The last time Sri Lanka’s top five were all dismissed for 15 or fewer runs in a Test innings at home, against Pakistan in Colombo (PSS). This is the sixth such instance for Sri Lanka in home Tests.19.16 Angelo Mathews’ average in his last six Test innings against Australia, with a highest of 35. In his first six innings against them, he averaged 87.25 – he remained unbeaten twice – with a century and three half-centuries.2 Consecutive ducks for David Warner in Tests against Sri Lanka. Warner was dismissed for a duck in the first innings of this Test, as well as in the second innings of the SCG Test in 2012-13. Incidentally, in the other four innings against them, he has made half-centuries. Sri Lanka and India are the only teams against whom Warner has two ducks.

Ashwin finds peace with the offbreak

R Ashwin has reaped the benefits of reverting to classic offspin bowling and with the confidence his captain shows in him, he can become deadly

Alagappan Muthu in Fatullah15-Jun-20152:00

Insights – Insights – Ashwin India’s go-to spinner in Asia

“Have they shook hands?”The thought couldn’t be helped. India had bowled Bangladesh out in 66 overs, and with enough in the bank to cash in on a follow-on. But the clouds had gathered again and there was only an hour or so left in the game. Barely two days’ play has been possible in the Fatullah Test. Chances of a result had gone down the drain, along with rain water to fill three dozen swimming pools. Yet with the potential for 30 overs including extra time, Virat Kohli wanted one last gamble. And he took out his ace in the hole: R Ashwin.An offbreak fizzed from outside leg, as it was supposed to. It drew Imrul Kayes into a prod, as was planned. The edge hitchhiked off the thigh pad to the first of two slips but was put down. If Bangladesh survived long enough, play was certain to be called off by the mandatory 15 overs. As it was. But Ashwin wouldn’t make it easy.India have said they are on the hunt for wins. So the lead spinner will be pestered for miracles. Trying too much can never be ruled out under such circumstances. But Ashwin had secured his first (of 10) five-wicket hauls outside India – 5 for 87 in 25 overs – through classic offspin bowling in the first innings. He would loop the ball up and then get it to dip. Turn and bounce become academic after that. He trusted his stock delivery, the only variations he tried were those of pace and length and he stuck to a rhythmic, repeatable action. Nothing needed to change.”He’s priceless, to be honest,” Kohli said, “In a subcontinent Test match, you won’t get any better than him. He can bowl at right-handers, at left-handers, he can deceive people with pace, with spin, with bounce. I mean you name it and he has it.”So nothing needs to change looking ahead either. Even in limited-overs cricket, Ashwin had worked out that he is at his best when dealing the ball enough flight. The results were on show at the World Cup: 13 wickets at an average of 25 and an economy of 4.28. Among spinners, he’d bowled the most overs – 77 – and maidens – 6 – and was only two wickets shy of Imran Tahir and Daniel Vettori’s tally.A clever Ashwin is an asset, but an Ashwin who is clear enough in his mind to base his attack around his offbreak can be deadly. Especially in subcontinent conditions. Batsmen are most nervous when the length of the ball prevents them from deciding whether to go forward or not. Often times that means they push with their hands to make up the distance. As Tamim Iqbal did, to be stumped here. As Mushfiqur Rahim did, to be caught. As Shuvagata Hom did, to be caught again.But with a well-stocked bag of tricks comes the compulsion to dip into them. There have been times when the carom ball was strutted out so often that the offbreak might have felt like the jealous understudy. Then there were the changes he often made to his bowling action. As though it had fallen behind the times and he wanted to stay hip. Ashwin had even ceded as much to explain his borrowing Sunil Narine’s action, replete will the full-sleeved shirt that hid the elbow.”I just wanted to see if you can get more revs on the ball, if you can do a little bit with your elbow, as much as [is allowed], that is,” he had said after the Asia Cup in March 2014. “That’s what it was all about. You can get a lot of advantage with these things. So why should I lag behind if someone else is getting a competitive edge?”He’d returned to his normal routine immediately after that match against Bangladesh, including ditching the full-sleeves.Besides, his own tinkering, captains have assigned defensive mandates to him. Especially in away Tests. And when protecting runs enters into a spinner’s equation, it can get ugly. The switch to a limited-overs mindset can come unbidden. The urge to bowl around the wicket and at the pads would seem appropriate. The fact that the batsman is quite comfortable with that, since you are diminishing your chances of getting him out, slips the mind. And the good ones find ways to milk that line far easier.Ashwin had discovered that on his first tour to Australia in 2011: 168 overs, 565 runs, nine wickets. On his next trip abroad, he was dropped after the Boxing Day Test in Johannesburg. Eight months outside the Test team. The murkiest time of his career so far. It is difficult to ascertain if he had fallen off the wagon himself, or if his confusion was a byproduct of the team wanting his role to be summarily overhauled: from attack to contain.”I think he is not being handled properly,” former India left-arm spinner Maninder Singh had said in February 2014. “Somebody who came into the Indian side because he had the capability and the urge to take wickets, he was eager to take wickets in 20-overs cricket, becomes defensive in Test cricket where you are supposed to take wickets … Something is going wrong somewhere, someone is giving him the wrong advice.”So Ashwin decided to block out the noise. The World T20 arrived. He did too, with a simple action and a fetish for flighted offbreaks. India waltzed into the final and wowed the audience with the guile their spinners persisted with even in the one format where they were supposed to be most endangered. The flatter trajectory was as good as outlawed, and Ashwin said, “The ball is landing exactly where I want.”There were evidences of similar form in Fatullah. He was able to assess the pitch quickly, the batsmen’s weaknesses in double that time, plan his traps and spring them. The confidence he had was exemplified when he was miffed at the appointment of a deep cover towards the dying stages of the fifth day and demanded he stride back inside the circle.”He understands the game well,” Kohli said. “As a captain, you don’t need to tell him much because he’s very clear about what he wants to do, and I’m pretty confident of his contribution in the coming season, and he’s pretty geared up as well. He’s going to be really important for us.”It would take courage and self-belief not to abuse his variations. More so against batsmen he will meet soon: AB de Villiers and Hashim Amla and Kumar Sangakkara can frighten bowlers to dig for plan Z and beyond. But the offbreak is a classic and there is a reason why the classics are highly rated.

Finn desperate to find an answer

After a 2013 where Steven Finn’s stock fell considerably, he thinks he is finding his way back to becoming the fearsome fast bowler he has hinted at being

George Dobell20-Dec-20130:00

‘England were broken’

When Steven Finn became the youngest Englishman to claim 50 Test wickets – he was 22 years and 63 days old at the time – it appeared England had unearthed a fast bowler that would serve them for much of the next decade.But that was 2011. Somewhere in the intervening years, Finn has lost his way to the point where he has not played a Test since July – the first match of the Ashes series in England – and has been overlooked for the role of third seamer by bowlers such as Chris Woakes, Tim Bresnan and Chris Tremlett.There have been times on this tour when Finn has cut a disconsolate figure. Struggling for rhythm, pace and confidence, he has hardly pressed for selection and has done little more than carry drinks for his colleagues and act as a net bowler. It wasn’t meant to be this way.The oft-repeated explanation for Finn’s troubles suggests they started once he was required to alter his action after his relatively frequent collisions with the stumps as he ran in to deliver the ball. Partially due to Finn’s habit, the ICC changed the playing regulations in April so that any delivery bowled after the bowler had collided with the stumps would be called no-ball.There is more than a grain of truth in such suggestions, too. But Finn was already struggling to hold down a place in the Test side, at least, as his economy rate – uncomfortably close to four an over – was deemed profligate by England’s standards.The end result has been that a man with a strike-rate (48.3) markedly better than James Anderson (59.3) or Stuart Broad (58.4) has been unable to find a place in the side. And despite – or some might say because of – the work of the ECB’s bowling coaches, Kevin Shine and David Saker, Finn’s form and confidence have continued to ebb. At times on this trip, he has looked unrecognisable from the fast bowler that he showed glimpses of becoming a couple of years ago.”It’s been very frustrating,” Finn admitted as the players enjoyed a rare day off on Friday, entertained by their sponsors, Jaguar, racing sports cars around a test track. “It’s quite obvious that the bowling hasn’t quite gone as I would have liked it to. I’ve been working as hard as I possibly can and bowling as many overs as I possibly can in practice in the nets, trying to get it right. But it hasn’t happened yet. I feel I’m moving in the right direction and I feel I’m getting there, but it hasn’t been right up to this point and that’s why I haven’t played.”Steven Finn has endured a difficult 2013•PA PhotosThere is a theory that Finn was confused by conflicting advice from his coaches at England and his coaches at Middlesex. While England recommended experimenting with a short run-up, Middlesex favoured a longer one. And while England recommended an improved wrist and seam position, Middlesex favoured him running in and simply trying to hit a probing length.”A lot of what I’ve heard about that is rubbish,” Middlesex’s director of cricket, Angus Fraser told ESPNcricinfo. “I’ve heard that we were trying to turn him into an outswing bowler. And I’ve heard people in the media suggest there is disagreement between us and England. It’s just not true. The fact is that England are his employers and he spends about 46 weeks a year with them and about six weeks a year with us. We are all working for the common good and that is seeing Steven fulfil his outstanding potential.”It is frustrating for everyone that he has not been going in the right direction, but these guys are not robots. Progression doesn’t go in a straight line. But he still has an excellent physique and huge promise. It took James Anderson a while to fulfil his talent, too.”Fraser does admit that there have been moments when the England and Middlesex coaches have disagreed, but insists it was “no big issue”.”We suggest things,” he explained. “We might say ‘try this’ and England might say something else. Yes, I felt he was better with a longer run-up, but in the end it is all up to him and there is a very good understanding between us and England.”Finn agrees. While he admits he has not suffered for a lack of advice, he insists the responsibility to “filter” such information much remain with him.”One of the advantages of modern cricket structures is that you have lots of people who are able to give you good information and valid points,” he said. “And, as a player, you are able to filter those points and do as you see fit with them. I’m very grateful for all the advice I get. Maybe I haven’t filtered the info as well as I possibly could have done over the last 12 months, but it feels as if I’m in a better position to do so now than I have been before.

“I’m very grateful for all the advice I get. Maybe I haven’t filtered the info as well as I possibly could have done over the last 12 months.”

“I’m moving back towards my best. There are glimpses of it in spells in games or in the nets, but it hasn’t been as consistent as I’d want it to be. That’s synonymous with the changes I’ve made which everyone knows about in the last 12 months. And I don’t feel as if I’m far away from being at my best if not better. I’m just keeping going with the hard work I’ve been doing to get there.”Fraser’s theory is that Finn might have been overthinking things. While one of the worries of the England camp is that if Finn is unable to control the seam position then he could damage the ball and prevent James Anderson and Stuart Broad gaining swing, conventional or reverse. But Fraser thinks that, if Finn is taking wickets with such a good strike-rate, that is a price worth paying.”The more he has been out of the side, the more the temptation is to tinker with things,” he explained. “And when you bowl with someone as talented as Anderson, with that perfect seam position, it is all too easy to start reaching for perfection.
But what Anderson does is unrealistic for most bowlers. All Steven really needs to do is go back to doing what he did was he was 21. The seam was like a windscreen wiper when I bowled, I didn’t have much of a slower ball and my yorker was pretty ordinary, too. But I hit a pretty good length and Steven could be the same.”Finn agreed: “Yes, there is a chance that I’ve over-complicated things in the last 12 months. At the end of the day bowling is very simple and usually whatever comes naturally to you is the thing that serves you best. But I’ve a very simple goal that I’m working towards and hopefully it comes round sooner rather than later.”My body has developed over the last 12 to 18 months and maybe I’ve grooved bad habits at times. But I’m working towards eradicating those. You get confidence from bowling well. You get confidence from the feeling off the end of your fingertips. I’ve had that in patches, but not on a consistent basis on this trip. It’s just about working towards getting that on a consistent basis.”Such consistency has come too late for this Ashes series. But if Finn is able to return to somewhere near his best for the 2015 edition, England will surely be all the stronger for it.

An early start, an early end

The highs and lows of a rollercoaster career that began when Taibu was only 18 and ended when he was only 29

ESPNcricinfo staff09-Jul-2012March 2000
In a major surprise, 16-year-old Taibu is picked for a tri-series in the West Indies even before he makes his first-class debut. Three months later, he is on stand-by for the Nottingham Test after an injury puts Andy Flower in doubt.June 2001
Taibu debuts against West Indies in the ODIs, batting at No. 10.July 2001
With Flower absent, Taibu plays his first Test against West Indies in Bulawayo. Picked as a wicketkeeper, he is pushed up to No. 3 in the second innings, but fails as Zimbabwe slip to a big defeat.March 2003
Plays alongside Andy Flower during the World Cup in South Africa. Scores 117 runs at an average of 29.25.April 2004
Becomes the youngest ever captain, aged 20, when he leads Zimbabwe in an ODI against Sri Lanka, marking the occasion with an unbeaten 96. He takes over after 13 white players including seniors like Heath Streak and Grant Flower are left out following a stand-off between them and the Zimbabwe board.January 2005
One of the highlights of his career is the second Test against Bangladesh in Dhaka as he scores 85* and 153 to help draw the match.September 2005
His last game as captain of the side is a Test in Harare which Zimbabwe lose to India.November 2005
Resigns from the captaincy and quits international cricket after running into problems with the board. “I am doing this, 80% because of the current situation in Zimbabwe Cricket and 20% because I do not like the terms of my offered contract,” he had said. He also said he had received personal threats from a Zimbabwe Cricket official.September 2006
Expresses his intentions to try and qualify for South Africa, only to change his mind after being told the switch would be difficult.July 2007
Ends a nearly two-year absence from Zimbabwe cricket when he returns for two four-day matches against India A at home. Becomes a regular with the senior side again.April 2008
Misses matches for Zimbabwe to play in the IPL for Kolkata Knight Riders.July 2009
Handed a 10-match ban by Zimbabwe Cricket after allegations that he and the board’s finance general manager were involved in a public row.October 2009
Makes a comeback to the national team for the home series against Kenya and Bangladesh.August 2011
On the eve of Zimbabwe’s return to Test cricket after a nearly six-year exile, he slams the country’s cricket administration for not doing enough for the game.July 2012
Announces retirement from the game to focus on working for the church

'Somewhere there's still a 16-year-old inside'

From loneliness to legspinners, injuries to influences, Sachin Tendulkar opens up as he rarely does

Cricinfo staff13-Nov-2009Twenty years, can you recount some of the poignant moments, or highlights?
The first and most important moment I’d like to remember right now would be the day I wore my India cap first. It was a dream which had come true, so I was on cloud nine. It was an absolutely fabulous feeling. After that there have been many but the most important one was that. Because growing up as a child the dream was to play for India, and nothing was bigger than that for me, and it continues the same way for me today. I think I’m very fortunate to be living that dream, and 20 years is a long time so there have been many special moments. To actually start counting them would be tough, but I’d definitely say the first day, walking with the playing XI, playing a Test in Pakistan was probably the greatest feeling. The journey began there, and whatever I did after that was a mere reflection of my contribution towards the nation’s cause.What do you remember of the first tour apart from the cricket?
A couple of times we went out shopping, and then obviously interacting with the media because we were not going out much – hardly once or twice in 40-45 days – it’s a long time to be in the hotel. We used to have this “Sunday Club”, and the media also joined the entire team and we were dressed differently. I was with a moustache, and it was a bit hard to believe for a 16-year-old to have a thick moustache and lipstick and that kind of thing, so it was party time and that’s something which I remember because there were so many pictures taken, and every now and then you see them. Other than that I felt the tour was tough and we played some terrific cricket. Over the four Tests it was a drawn series, and I felt that there was no dull moment in the entire series. Lahore was the flattest track where nothing much happened off the wicket, but otherwise the remaining three surfaces we played on had a bit of life, bounce, pace and the cricket was also entertaining.How have you managed to change with the times? How difficult was it to do that?
Since 1989 plenty of things have changed in the game; that includes the introduction of the third umpire, the hot spot and various things, the introduction of Twenty20. The most noticeable change I feel is because of Twenty20. We’ve seen plenty of innovative shots, which are occasionally used in Test cricket. In one-day cricket batsmen are backing themselves to try something new, also occasionally in Test cricket. So in a one-day match the average score has definitely gone from 210 to now 265-270 as a par score. To make 265 on a decent surface is not a great score as such.Also, in Tests you see more results now. There was a phase where you used to hear that Test matches are getting boring because there are no results, but I don’t think that is the case now. There are results in virtually every match, and that is probably because it is played more aggressively and batsmen are willing to take more chances. With time I have also changed, and everyone sitting in this room, we’ve all changed for the better. And I’ve tried to make myself a better cricketer. There is always room for improvement, and I’ve always believed that whenever I go out and practise, there has to be a purpose. The process continues, it’s never-ending because every day there is a fresh challenge and you need to be on your toes. You’ve got to be moving forward, and that is what I’ve tried to do.

Tendulkar on match-fixing

It was a dark phase, I don’t want to reiterate that on this occasion. But I heard something that was fascinating, the series we played against Australia immediately after that (in 2001) – it was the three-Test-match series and five ODIs – and both series were decided in the final half hour of their duration. Both these series were instrumental in bringing back the crowds to the stadiums, and I thought we as a team really performed well in that series and that started a new chapter, something I was looking for, to close the previous chapter and it’s better that we keep it closed.

How do you stay on your toes for 20 years?
It was definitely a lot of hard work and there are certain things that all sportsmen have to follow: dedication, discipline, your focus on the game, your priorities in life. All those factors are extremely important, and for me I felt I was very lucky to have a family like [I do]. My brother always guided me, my father always supported me, my mother always fed me well. There’s this combination of inner forces contributing in different directions. Mother doesn’t understand much about cricket, but she prays for my success and India’s success, so all these things are important. Long discussions with my brother on cricket and then support from the other brother and my sister – I represent all of them when I go out to the middle, but then there are those difficult moments which I feel are challenging, and [I wonder] what should I be doing in these moments, and that is what I share with my wife, my entire family, and that is one reason I’ve been able to last for such a long time. I cannot fail to thank the people of India for all the affection and love, the support. Whatever I do, whatever level I perform, you need people around you to share your happiness with them and I’ve got more than a billion people to share that with, so that means a lot to me. Because of all these things you are inspired to go out and do something special for all the people.Has it been hard to stay humble over the years?
Well I’ve not made any effort to stay humble, it’s just my upbringing. In the early stage of my career when I hadn’t played for India, I was just playing school cricket, I was still scoring a lot of runs but nobody got carried away in my family over success. It’s quite easy for a 12- or 13-year-old boy to get carried away when he sees his picture printed in the newspaper, because it’s something special, but that is where I felt my family made sure my feet were on the ground. We always celebrated by distributing sweets, it wasn’t very fancy, and that was where it stopped. Everyone was happy and enjoyed that moment, but the next day was what happens in the next game, and how do you get better in the next game, and that process has continued. That’s something which has kept me grounded, and needless to say, just watching my father – my father didn’t teach me – but just looking at him and watching him closely I picked up a lot of things, and the most important thing he told me was: “It’s your nature which is going to stay permanently with you, the rest will come and go.”David Boon tells a story about you asking him for advice on facing West Indies. Can you elaborate on that?
David Boon… When I was in Australia in 1991, I hadn’t played many West Indian fast bowlers. The only time I had played a West Indian was when we played county cricket against Derbyshire (in 1990) when Ian Bishop was there, and I played one exhibition game in Canada against West Indies. But other than that in an international match I hadn’t played a West Indian. In Australia we were playing a triangular series where West Indies joined us and they had some terrific players, world-class fast bowlers. I’d watched Boon quite closely, and I thought I should be picking up things from the top players in the world and I wanted to get as much information as possible and become a better cricketer. I thought it was a good chance to speak to him, and get to know how to face certain bowlers on Australian tracks.Sunil Gavaskar has been one of the people Tendulkar has looked to for advice•Getty ImagesWho has been the biggest influence on you as a player?
I think it’s my brother Ajit, with whom I discuss a lot of cricket and he knows my batting possibly better than any other person in the world, and he understands my mindset as well, so I talk a lot with him. Then there are the other players from India. Sunil Gavaskar and Ravi Shastri, they travel with us whenever we’re out there playing, it’s good to have them there to share an opinion or get their views on how we are playing as a team and an individual. That has helped over the years, and there have been so many other senior players who have been coaches, so all those guys have been helpful. As far as help and guidance is concerned, there hasn’t been an instance where a senior player has said I’m not interested or I’ve not been watching you and don’t want to share any opinions. They’ve always been helpful and shared their ideas, which has played an important role.Regarding practising with purpose, one of the more celebrated instances was having legspinners bowl at you into the rough from round the wicket before you faced Warne in 1998.
In 1998 I prepared differently, we were practising in Chennai and before that I practised in Mumbai. All my Ranji Trophy colleagues, I used to ask them to bowl round the wicket into the rough, because that was something which I hadn’t faced for a long time. In spite of having been around for almost nine years at that stage, I hadn’t played any legspinner that would bowl round the wicket in the rough, so I made all the bowlers do that. Then when we went to Chennai, Laxman Sivaramakrishnan bowled to me. He gave wonderful practice. So all those sessions really helped and the purpose behind that was just to get used to those angles and the areas, and identify which are the areas from which I can attack and which are the areas I need to defend.Between Warne and Murali, who did you consider the most dangerous and why?
I’m of the opinion that if someone goes past 500-600 wickets, how do you differentiate? Both guys are special, both are match-winners and both are world champions. I would not like to pick one, I believe in respecting an individual’s strengths, and the way they both have motivated youngsters in various parts of the world is just incredible. I would just sit back and applaud them.

I requested both Azhar (the captain) and Ajit Wadekar (coach) to “just give me one opportunity. I’m very confident as in the first 15 overs I can play some big shots. I feel I’ll be able to deliver. And if I fail I’ll never ever come to you again”. caption: How Tendulkar got to open the innings in one-dayers. He blasted a 49-ball 83 in his first try

If they were both bowling at either end, who would you rather not face?
I think I would probably go and sit in the dressing room [].Tell us about the time you were hit by Waqar [Younis] ]in 1989.
I still remember that incident. Ajit had come to watch me for the first time. I could see him sitting in front of the dressing room. India were in a fragile position in the second innings at 39 for 4 with a day and half still left when I got hit on the nose. Even before that I had been hit on the nose in school cricket on bad practice wickets, an experience that had got rid of the fear. So when I was hit by Waqar, that got me more competitive and I decided not to move from the middle and I would continue to fight.In 1989, before you played Pakistan, there was speculation you might be picked to face the West Indies, did you think at that time that you were ready?
I remember the late Raj Singh Dungarpur was the chairman of selectors at that time, and we were playing Ranji Trophy semi-finals against Delhi in Mumbai and he walked up to me and said, “I know there has been talk and there’ve been articles in the papers that you may go to West Indies, but I want to tell you that you won’t be going because we still feel that it’s too early and it’s important for you to prepare for your SSC exams.” So I did that. Before that also I’d known him for quite some time. So his guidance and encouragement meant a lot to me, and what he said was: “There’ll be Irani Trophy, I’m sure you will be a part of it, and go out there and enjoy yourself, give your case, and good things will happen.”What was different about batting at international level or did you just find that this was too easy?
Nothing is easy and you have to work hard for it. I’m a person who hates taking anything for granted, I want to prepare to the best of my ability. I was always confident about my ability. I wanted to go out and express myself to the best of my ability, and if the pre-match preparation was good then I was in a position to go out and deliver, and that is something I focussed on. Even today I do that. There may be innings where you don’t do well, that’s fine, but as long as you have given 100%, that is what matters to me. That is something which has been happening right from my school days.I realised early that I could hit every ball, in school cricket and to a certain extent in Ranji Trophy, I would go out and attack, but after going to Pakistan and New Zealand, England, Australia, those first few series and also South Africa, it taught me a lot. It taught me to be more selective, taught me to build an innings, and also taught me to respect bowlers. I think to respect a bowler when he’s bowling very well is a wise thing to do, which I learned, and it’s something which happens with age and experience. You need to have that exposure, and I felt that the first few tours really helped me.”Yes you feel bad because I’ve done well but the team hasn’t well. So you are not excited and you cannot share that wonderful moment with people because you’ve lost the game”•Getty ImagesHow have you separated your cricket from everything that happens around you?
I don’t know, cricket lives in my heart and whenever I’m on a cricket field I enjoy it, and somewhere there’s still a 16-year-old hidden inside who wants to go out and express himself, so I do that and it comes naturally and I don’t make any special effort to show enthusiasm. It’s been my life and I enjoy every moment, I enjoy challenges, it’s a package deal, ups and downs, wonderful moments and there are disappointments, so all that makes you a stronger person and you learn to deal with various things in life.Do you feeling lonely when you do well and the team still loses?
I have never been asked this question before. But, actually, yes you feel bad because I’ve done well but the team hasn’t well. But I play for the team and it is not about individuals. You got to win as a team. So you are not excited and you cannot share that wonderful moment with people because you’ve lost the game. It is a difficult thing. But on the brighter side when you have one billion people to share your joy there is no better than that. But when that doesn’t happen you look forward to the next game, and try and make sure that you perform better as a team and do something special which can make all of us smile.What would you rank as your most memorable innings?
There are a few innings where I’ve really done well and where the team has won. In that respect the 2003 World Cup game against Pakistan was the biggest match of my life.Going back to the earlier part of my career, the second Test, at Faislabad, I scored only 58 or 59. But in the previous Test I had got out early and I had actually questioned myself whether I belonged here. I felt out of place, tense, and didn’t know what was happening and it wasn’t a great experience. In the second Test I went out and decided that come what may I’m going to be there. I had already spoken to a lot of players, and they had told me: “Just be there for 15-20 minutes, things would start getting better.” So I decided I was not going to get worried about runs, and at what rate I was going to score them. That particular innings was the turning point of my life because after that I felt I do belong here. It is just a matter of tackling the first few minutes, of judging the pace, bounce, spin. I was new to Test cricket and something like that needed to happen to make me feel good and make me believe that I belonged here.Could you share with us some of your memories from childhood?
My childhood was spent in Sahitya Sahwas colony in Bandra East. Every moment with my friends was special. Cricket started for me there, I broke a lot of glass panes of neighbouring houses, but all the seniors appreciated the competition on display. It was a good atmosphere and the passion for cricket started there.My actual cricket started when I was 11. My brother spotted the spark in me and then he took me to [Ramakant] Achrekar sir. Those three to four years under him were really important for my development. He would hide behind trees to see our games, and then point out the errors later on. We would have fun but it was guarded. Tell us about the first century of your life.
I was unbeaten on 96 overnight and couldn’t sleep. We [Sharadashram English] were playing against Don Bosco, and I was impatient to get to my first ever century. Another reason for my impatience was I had invited Achrekar sir to dinner at my home, but he said the day I score a century he would come. Next morning my father took me to pay obeisance at a Ganpati temple. I scored the century in the very first over. The first thing I told Achrekar sir on going back to the change room was he now had no way out but to come to my house.Does the relentless media introspection suffocate you?

This is the way I’ve known my life from the age of 14. That is when I started playing my first-class cricket when I was part of Mumbai Ranji Trophy team. But I’m comfortable with it. I don’t do anything differently, I just do whatever I’m comfortable with. People have appreciated me for what I’m so I don’t make any special effort to change. I believe every individual should respect the other in whatever you say or do and you have to think twice. I’m not aggressive off the field because I need to conserve it for the play on the field.One of the highs of Tendulkar’s captaincy, the Sahara Cup in 1997•AFPWhat is the secret behind your success as a cricketer?
Plenty of hours on the field, not as many hours in the gym! It is a combination of long practice sessions, workouts and playing as many matches – practice and live – as possible. One important thing my coach Ramakant Achrekar introduced me to was the concept of match temperament. The reason my brother [Ajit Tendulkar] took me to him [Achrekar] was solely because he made all his students play as many practice matches as possible. I would attend my school in the morning, go to the ground in the afternoon and bat at No. 4 in a practice match. That gave me the confidence to go out in the middle and perform in a match and also taught me how to read various situations in a match. Because every afternoon the conditions were different situation, different theme, and I had to bat differently. So all those factors were extremely important in making me the cricketer that I am today, and however much I thank him [Achrekar] it is not enough.Was opening for the first time a big step?
In 1994 we were playing in Auckland. I was the vice-captain then and just before the ODI I got to know that [Navjot Singh] Sidhu was not fit as he had woken up with a stiff neck. I requested both Azhar [Mohammad Azharuddin] and Ajit Wadekar [captain and coach] to “just give me one opportunity. I’m very confident as in the first 15 overs I can play some big shots. I feel I’ll be able to deliver. And if I fail I’ll never ever come to you again”. They both agreed graciously, and I was able to go out and perform. It helped me as a cricketer because you go out and face the new ball and at the same time you are looking at putting the ball away. Those days the first over one would look to leave as many balls as possible and not lose wickets early on and then gradually accelerate. But things started changing around that time with [Mark] Greatbach in 1992 World Cup and then [Sanath] Jayasuriya in 1996 to play big shots in the first 15 overs and I did the same once I started opening. To do that you had to move in quickly and get in the right position. Overall that decision helped my game because in ODIs I was facing the new ball and batting No. 4 in Test cricket. Overall I was enjoying the balance.Are you satisfied with your two captaincy stints?
It was a great honour to captain the country. There were some wonderful moments. The very first Test itself was memorable, in Delhi. Then we won the Titan Cup in India against the two toughest opponents – Australia and South Africa. Then, in Toronto, when we beat Pakistan in the Sahara Cup. There were many occasions where we came close to winning, but just couldn’t cross the final hurdle. It was an experience full of highs and lows.

Jardine's view not the whole story

David Frith reviews In Quest of the Ashes by Douglas Jardine

David Frith13-Oct-2005



Publishers’ preferences continue to perplex. Of the many books on the notorious 1932-33 Bodyline Ashes series, this one, by England’s captain, first published in 1933, had already been reissued in 1984, by Orbis, with a foreword by John Arlott. Now a foreword by Mike Brearley and a tender afterword by Douglas Jardine’s daughter Fianach come with a fresh edition for those who missed the earlier ones, that they might sample for themselves this battlefield account written in lawyers’ language.It is predictably prejudiced. Jardine was scornful of his Australian adversaries, whose ranks swelled during this stormiest of cricket tours. From his insistence on referring throughout to the provocative fast attack as “leg theory” to his contempt for Don Bradman and most things Australian, this account is limited by, or, as his supporters might insist, fortified by the bias.But then all the contemporary accounts of Bodyline – bar perhaps the books by Mailey, Hobbs and Wilmot – were one-eyed. It was not until Jack Fingleton’s Cricket Crisis (1946) that visibility around the dispute began to clear. Probably we should forgive Jardine his prejudices, for his obstinacy reflects the very quality that brought England success on those steamy Australian cricket fields almost three-quarters of a century ago.
Much of the informed detail here, of course, could have come only from Jardine’s pen, such as his tactical thinking, his opinion of the jeering crowds, his perception of Bradman’s weaknesses, and the insistence that this mega-runmaker was not intended as the sole target of Harold Larwood and Bill Voce’s attack. Jardine’s conviction was that if South Australia’s Tim Wall could take all 10 in an innings of a Shield match, then surely none of Australia’s top batsmen in the early 1930s could be competent against pace.Wherever possible Jardine summons support from Australians. Arthur Mailey and Jack Ryder were two who didn’t mind England’s “leg theory”, and his concise match descriptions incorporate sympathy of a sort for both Bill Woodfull and Bert Oldfield after their serious injuries at Larwood’s hands in the tumultuous Adelaide showdown. The author also displays the sense of humour so familiar to his close friends. Gleefully recalled is the barracker’s cry of “Let the ——- [not batsman!] die of thirst!” when Australia’s captain was about to offer England’s leader a drink. But Jardine expresses contempt for the mobs who tried to make his life a misery from Adelaide across to Brisbane as his menacing Notts fast men bowled their fast “long hops” (no alarming nouns such as “bouncers” or “bumpers” here).He would have preferred to have played his cricket on empty grounds. The “unsportsmanlike” charge outraged him more than anything else. Brearley, who knows about personal targeting by Australian crowds, sees Jardine’s self-defence as disingenuous, and craves more detail on a number of issues merely touched upon in this volume. A significant book, it still leaves so very much unsaid.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus