VIDEO: Humiliation for Arsenal! Infamous £72m ex-Gunners flop Nicolas Pepe bags scruffy goal for Villarreal against his former club

Arsenal were embarrassed on Wednesday as infamous flop Nicolas Pepe scored for Villarreal at the Emirates in a pre-season friendly.

  • Pepe flopped badly at the Emirates
  • Now with La Liga club
  • Pepe scored in first half
Follow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱
  • WHAT HAPPENED?

    In a pre-season friendly at the Emirates, Villarreal took an early lead against Arsenal thanks to a scruffy finish from Pepe. The winger, of course, joined the Gunners in a £72 million ($96m) deal back in 2019. He went on to play 112 times for the club but could only muster 27 goals and 21 assists, and was loaned to Nice in 2022 before being sold to Trabzonspor before later joining Villarreal. On Wednesday, though, he got ahead of the struggling Jakub Kiwior to poke an effort into the bottom corner, refusing to celebrate afterwards.

  • Advertisement

  • WATCH THE CLIP

  • THE BIGGER PICTURE

    Pepe only managed three goals for Villarreal last season, although he did provide six assists, as the club finished fifth in La Liga. He will hope to finally deliver on the immense potential he showed in Ligue 1 in 2025-26. 

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • AFP

    WHAT NEXT?

    Arsenal will play one more pre-season friendly before the Premier League season gets underway. They face Athletic Club in the Emirates Cup this weekend. 

WATCH: USWNT star Trinity Rodman scores game-winner in return from injury as Washington Spirit defeat Portland Thorns

The 23-year-old was substituted onto the pitch in the second half and found the winner in stoppage time

  • Washington Spirit defeat Portland Thorns 2-1
  • USWNT's Rodman scores game-winner
  • Forward made long-awaited return from injury in match
Follow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱
  • WHAT HAPPENED?

    U.S. women's national team forward Trinity Rodman returned from injury and scored the game-winner for the Washington Spirit as they defeated the Portland Thorns 2-1 on Sunday. Rodman, 23, made her long-awaited return, making her first appearance for the club since April after taking time away to deal with a back injury. 

    On her strike, a 92nd-minute volley, she capitalized on a ball that was flicked on in the box by fellow U.S. international Croix Bethune, and she put it into the back of the net first time with her right boot. It capped off a two-goal comeback as the Spirit took three points in front of their home fans in Washington, D.C. 

  • Advertisement

  • WATCH RODMAN'S WINNER

  • THE BIGGER PICTURE

    Rodman's return was a welcome sight for both the Spirit and the USWNT. She'd been battling injury for months, dating back to the 2024 Paris Olympics, with a lingering back issue causing her to be "in pain all the time."

    Sunday marked Rodman's first goal of the 2025 NWSL season. In 2024, she made 26 appearances for the Spirit, scoring eight goals and recording six assists while leading them to the NWSL Championship game, where they fell short to the Orlando Pride.

    For the USWNT, Rodman has amassed 47 caps, scoring 11 goals and recording nine assists.

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • Getty Images

    WHAT NEXT FOR RODMAN?

    The Spirit are back in action next weekend when they take to the road to take on Gotham FC. The Spirit sit second in the NWSL standings, while the Bats sit in eighth – though just seven points separate them. 

Gary Neville's row with Nottingham Forest rumbles into new season with pundit still barred from City Ground

Nottingham Forest are seeing assurances from Sky Sports before allowing Gary Neville back into their stadium for the 2025-26 season.

  • Neville criticised owner Marinakis
  • Barred from City Ground
  • Forest want assurances before lifting ban
Follow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱
  • WHAT HAPPENED?

    The ex-Manchester United captain saw his access to Forest's City Ground revoked at the end of last season after he criticised club owner Evangelos Marinakis on air. The issue is still believed to be unresolved, and the Tricky Trees are seeking assurances that Neville will be more careful when referencing Marinakis in the future.

  • Advertisement

  • Getty Images Sport

    WHAT NEVILLE SAID

    Neville accused Forest of behaving like a "mafia gang" after releasing a statement attacking referee Stuarrt Attwell, and then ripped into them after Marinakis and head coach Nuno Espirito Santo clashed on the pitch in April 2024. He was therefore denied accreditation to the Midlands stadium, and released a statement on social media, saying: "I’ve dished out my fair share of criticism and praise in the last 14 years of doing this job and have never come close to this unprecedented action. Personally, I think it’s disappointing that a great club like Nottingham Forest have been reduced to making such a decision. Whilst they have every right to choose who they let into their own stadium, it’s symptomatic of things that have happened over the last 12 months with the club."

  • THE BIGGER PICTURE

    Forest are believed to be willing to move past the row with Neville, providing he makes a handful of promises to them ahead of the new season. Reports suggest talks between the two will be needed, despite Sky believing the issue was a one-off incident.

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • Getty Images Sport

    WHAT NEXT?

    Forest's Premier League opener against Brentford will be broadcast live on Sunday, but Neville will instead be covering Manchester United vs Arsenal at Old Trafford.

What we loved, gasped at, and were disappointed by in the 2019 World Cup

Our writers and reporters pick their standout moments of the World Cup

ESPNcricinfo staff18-Jul-20193:22

Top 10 moments from World Cup 2019

What did you most enjoy?

George Dobell: The spirit. Cricket has become a little more gentle, a little more decent, a little nicer since the last World Cup. It was demonstrated in the gracious manner in which New Zealand reacted to their misfortune in the final. Other teams would have taken to the courts; New Zealand shrugged it off with a phlegmatic smile and warm praise for England.We saw it when Virat Kohli asked the Indian supporters to applaud Steven Smith too. Oh, and for all the rubbishness of British weather, I’m not sure another nation could have produced the multi-ethnic crowds supporting every team and at every venue without need for segregation or concern. In that way, at least, it was a great World Cup. Osman Samiuddin: The fact that it stayed alive until pretty much the last few games of the group stages. It could’ve gone so wrong had Sri Lanka lost to England that day – and England’s own tortured run to the semis was immensely enjoyable. Andrew Fidel Fernando: The bowling. I, like everyone else, thought it would be a batting World Cup. It wasn’t. The yorkers were wonderful. Melinda Farrell: Perhaps it’s self-indulgent, but it’s seeing lovely people from all around the world, people you might not have seen for a few years. The friends and colleagues who inspire you and keep you smiling when you’re running on empty. Alagappan Muthu: Kane Williamson – Every run he made was under pressure. But look back at the replays and it feels like he was having a net. Only thing missing was a straight drive while he was yawning. Sharda Ugra: For being Skills Inc. Before it began, the lament arose: 400! 500! The end of bowling! The end of contests! Fortunately, it was a World Cup of bowlers, merchants of pace and sultans of swing, with their magic variations. And yet it was marked by generous passages of high-quality batting and outright biffing. What’s not to enjoy? Andrew Miller: Full houses for pretty much every group-stage match – a tribute to multicultural Britain and a clue as to where the future of the sport in this country needs to lie as it builds on the interest generated this summer. Bangladesh’s fans deserve a special mention in this regard – from The Oval to Lord’s to Southampton to Cardiff, they were legion. The toy-tiger industry alone could prop up the economy post-Brexit.Karthik Krishnaswamy: The pitches. The England-Pakistan series before the World Cup made 500 seem like a real possibility, but we ended up with lots of 240-meets-240 matches instead.Mohammad Isam: Having the best of both worlds as a reporter. I sat with the crowd for some of the matches, which not only ensured that I hardly missed a ball, but also gave me fresh perspective. At the same time, one of the great privileges of my profession is to witness up close how a cricket team prepares and deals with high-pressure situations.Nagraj Gollapudi: Ball dominating bat. Fast men telling batsmen: give me respect.Alan Gardner: Seeing players, fans (and colleagues) from all around the world descend on the UK and help take the World Cup carnival on the road, from Taunton all the way up to Chester-le-Street.Smouldering Faf du Plessis smouldered right out of the World Cup•Getty Images

What was the biggest surprise?

Isam: India not making it to the final still surprises me, given their experience and overall skill level. All they had to do was negotiate a strong opening spell from Trent Boult and Matt Henry. They weren’t chasing a big total too.Farrell: That the expectation of sexy legspin turning teams on their heads was not fulfilled.Gardner: India not making the final. New Zealand knocking them out, having lost their previous three games, was more surprising than the fact they ran England so close.Krishnaswamy: The lack of spinners among the top wicket-takers. The four years between 2015 and this World Cup were the years of the wristspinner, but Imran Tahir apart, none of them had a particularly memorable tournament, with Rashid Khan enduring a poor one by his standards.Samiuddin: South Africa. I didn’t think they were among the very top favourites but I didn’t foresee that they’d struggle so badly and be one of the first teams to be knocked out of contention for the semis.Miller: The pitches were far less conducive to murderous strokeplay than had been predicted in the build-up to the tournament, and while that came close to sinking England’s tournament after their stumble against Sri Lanka, it also vindicated their eventual triumph as they took their licks, learned their lessons, and ground it out on another dog of a deck in that thrilling final. Elsewhere, Afghanistan’s failure to land a major scalp was the biggest surprise for me. Riven by politics, they were a shadow of their true selves.Dobell: The pitches. The plan was for absolute belters where 350-plus was par, but we saw scores of 250 defended often. Whether it was the weather or the amount asked of the groundsmen, something went quite wrong there. It created several fun games, but that really was more by accident than design.Ugra: The speed with which South Africa faded despite having so many gifted, world-class players in their ranks. It was mournful to watch them implode. There were no more jokes to be made about the C word, and Faf du Plessis’ graphic description of what defeat did to teams lingered as the event wore on. Muthu: Pitches – almost forgot that England in the not-so-distant past was a bowler-friendly place.New Zealand: making cricket a kinder, more gentle and decent sport•Getty Images

Which match did you most enjoy?

Samiuddin: West Indies-New Zealand, India-New Zealand, Pakistan-England for the atmosphere, but the final, by a stretch, wins it as game of the tournament for me.Farrell: Impossible to go past the final, although “enjoy” might not be the right word. It was an experience unlike any I’ve ever had at a sporting event. Exhilarating, mind-blowing, nerve-jangling and utterly overwhelming.Gollapudi: Let us leave the final aside, as it was the game of our lives. Outside of that, I’d pick the India-New Zealand semi-final.Krishnaswamy: My enjoyment of some of the most thrilling games of the tournament – New Zealand-South Africa, New Zealand-West Indies, the final – was compromised by the frenetic activity of being on ball-by-ball or live-report duty. The games I enjoyed most, therefore, were probably those I simply watched. It was late at night when Australia were chasing 326 against South Africa, and I was lying in bed, watching on my phone, drifting off to sleep one moment and jolting awake the next. When it ended, my head was buzzing with everything that had happened, and falling asleep was suddenly a struggle.Ugra: Pakistan v South Africa. Because it was prototype Pakistan, where the textbooks are tossed aside, the process bullshit is ignored, and the game is played with a focused intensity and urgency. To be at Lord’s as Pakistanis streamed in, chatting loudly, cursing the players and their performance against India, yet determined to be in one voice was to see one wave roll in outside the field. On it, the team’s cricket turned tidal and drowned South Africa.Dobell: West Indies v New Zealand at Old Trafford. Partly because I was there as a spectator – a close finish is less fun when you have to write about it – and partly simply as it was a wonderful advert for our great game.Fernando: Of the ones I personally attended, New Zealand v South Africa was probably the best. Muthu: New Zealand v West Indies – West Indies’ fire, New Zealand’s cool. If only it could have happened again in the final.Isam: Bangladesh striking down South Africa in their first match, in front of a full house at The Oval, particularly with their very one-sided bilateral series in South Africa a year and a half ago in mind. It wasn’t a shock result but it was a surprise how Bangladesh were more disciplined than the South Africans.Miller: West Indies v New Zealand at Old Trafford was the perfect neutral’s showdown. It had been a fine match in its own right throughout – Kane Williamson’s stunning century after two golden ducks for New Zealand’s openers was worth the admission alone. But for the match to then be lit up by that grandstand finish from Carlos Brathwaite was something else entirely.Gardner: The second semi-final was a rare instance of England clinically dismantling the mighty World Cup-winning machine that is Australia. Having not won a knockout match in 27 years, they did it with ease and – shockingly – appeared to have fun doing so.The only losers in that World Cup final were our fingernails•Getty Images

What was the biggest wow moment?

Dobell: Did you see the final?Miller: Well, apart from the bleeding obvious… there’s Mitchell Starc’s yorker to Ben Stokes at Lord’s. Not only was it utterly sensational, it left the hosts and favourites on the brink of elimination, and set the group stage ablaze.Fernando: James Neesham’s outrageous one-handed catch to dismiss Dinesh Karthik in the semi-final. I gasped so hard my breathing didn’t return to normal for several minutes. Muthu: Starc v Stokes. The ball goes out as Mitchell Starc releases it. Then it swings in because of mad reverse. Physics can maybe explain that. But I still won’t get how it got the Player of the Final out on 89.Gardner: There are a dozen instances from the climax of the final, but the one I’ll never get my head around is Trent Boult stepping on the rope at long-on. That was the game, right there.Ugra: The two direct-hit run-outs in the India-New Zealand semi-final: Ravindra Jadeja getting Ross Taylor and Martin Guptill getting MS Dhoni. In a World Cup of outstanding catches and pieces of fielding, over two days we watched exact throws become the magic moments in the game.Isam: When Jofra Archer burst through Soumya Sarkar, struck the bail and had the ball sailing over the ropes in Cardiff.Farrell: That Martin Guptill catch at leg gully off a full-blooded Steve Smith pull. There were a lot of breathtaking catches in the tournament, but that one, for me, was the most incredible.Samiuddin: Guptill’s catch to (help) dismiss Steven Smith at Lord’s. And then his direct-hit run-out of Dhoni as well. Actually, the latter probably wins.Krishnaswamy: Ben Stokes’ Dive of God. There’s a Maradona-esque, Botham-esque quality to some players, where everything – even something as outlandish as an inadvertent deflection for four overthrows – seems possible, and fated to have happened. Stokes is exactly that kind of player.The ball that could not be: Mitchell Starc’s yorker was a guided missile into Ben Stokes’ stumps•David Rogers/Getty Images

What was the most gripping phase of play?

Miller: Until Sunday, I’d have said the implosion of India’s top order in the Old Trafford semi-final. It was a Bo(u)lt through the Blue, as 2015’s beaten finalists confirmed unequivocally that they were the real deal. But come on. Every detail of that final climax, from the 49th over of England’s chase onwards, will be tattooed on my retinas till I die. Muthu: Last five overs of the final – I was on the live report and I was screaming every ball, and that’s why all of it is in capital letters.Samiuddin: Jos Buttler’s counter against Pakistan, the last two overs Carlos Brathwaite played against New Zealand at Old Trafford, Shaheen Afridi’s opening burst against New Zealand. But also, in the final, Colin de Grandhomme’s entire spell against England. It was just so counterintuitive (and down to the pitch) that a bowler like him would be such a threat against a batting line-up like England’s. The pitch as the great leveller.Ugra: Jasprit Bumrah’s tenth over against Afghanistan and the awesomeness of its inevitable efficiency. As Mohammad Nabi began to eat away at a modest total and India teetered, Bumrah was India’s insurance policy. It was duly encashed.Dobell: England’s chase against Australia at Edgbaston. And the way they attacked the bowling, in particular. Mitchell Starc might be one of the greatest white-ball bowlers in history, but after five overs he had conceded 50. Nathan Lyon was hit for six first ball and Steven Smith conceded three sixes – one of them may not yet have landed – in his only over. This wasn’t the England any of us grew up watching. And it was all the better for it.Isam: Kane Williamson’s captaincy when he brought on Colin de Grandhomme in the final. He was supposed to be New Zealand’s weakest bowler, but the in-and-out fields and lengths kept England guessing, and showed why Williamson is the rightful heir in a long line of great Kiwi thinkers that includes Richard Hadlee, Martin Crowe, Stephen Fleming and Brendon McCullum.Fernando: Angelo Mathews winning the match against West Indies with the ball, after he hadn’t bowled even in the nets for eight months, was unforgettable.Krishnaswamy: Carlos Brathwaite against New Zealand. All the classic ingredients were there – a seemingly wrecked chase in a must-win game, no recognised batsmen at the other end – and when the realisation dawned that this was actually happening, everything slowed down, and every ball became an event. New Zealand invited (and eventually earned) fines and demerit points for their long deliberations between balls, but all those long gaps were filled with exquisite tension.Gardner: Overs 49-50 (of England’s innings) and the two Super Overs in the final. They are seared on my cerebral cortex for eternity.Demons in the pitch? Not for master swordsman Ravindra Jadeja against New Zealand at Old Trafford•Getty Images

What was your favourite individual performance?

Dobell: Probably Chris Woakes’ against Australia at Edgbaston. I’ve known Chris quite a long time. Maybe there’s a more unassuming, humble international sportsperson, but I’ve not met them. To come through the injury setbacks he has had and enjoy a day like that on his home ground in a World Cup semi-final… yeah, that was a good day.Samiuddin: Babar Azam’s hundred against New Zealand. Been watching him for a long time and he is so clearly so obviously such a good player who only needed one big match-winning innings to be acknowledged as more than just a very good player – but rather one who is potentially a great already.Miller: Jonny Bairstow’s screw-you-all century against India. His wrath was ridiculous, but his response to those perceived slights in the media was both brilliant and utterly foreseeable.Gollapudi: Two. Ravindra Jadeja’s cavalier half-century against New Zealand in the semi-final, when he batted on a different pitch to the rest of the batsmen. And Ben Stokes’ smart, patient, daring innings in the final, an innings that has the potential to inspire and create a generation of cricketers across the world.Farrell: I’m going to throw Sheldon Cottrell in there. Not for a particular performance, although he had plenty, plus catch, but for all of the times I saw kids imitating his salute. They say that performing is all about connecting with the audience and he nailed it.Gardner: Since I was there and got to write about it, Lasith Malinga’s monstering of England at Headingley. It was also a performance that ensured the group stage would hold interest until pretty much the end. Muthu: Brathwaite versus New Zealand. Those sixes. The courage to trust that he had the game to keep out the best bowling attack in the world and also clatter them for sixes to win the game for West Indies.Isam: I am split between Shakib Al Hasan’s hundred against West Indies and his full quota of ten overs from the end with the shorter midwicket boundary against India at Edgbaston. Of course the performance in Taunton won Bangladesh the match, but his bowling is a testament to how effortless Shakib is as a cricketer, even when he takes on big challenges.Ugra: Babar Azam’s century against New Zealand, which is a bit biased given that I wrote about his back story and knew that a breakout performance had yet to appear. Everybody loves a stylist, and when the stylist becomes a match-winner, it’s like the gods have given their approval.Fernando: Malinga’s wobble-bellied four-for against England.Krishnaswamy: Chris Woakes’ new-ball bowling was a joy to watch throughout, and his first spell in the semi-final at Edgbaston was outstanding. Australia had never lost a World Cup semi-final, and here they were, 14 for 3, with Woakes’ control, swing and seam doing the bulk of the damage.600-plus runs, 11 wickets: Shakib Al Hasan put up numbers no player had done in a World Cup before•Getty Images

Who was the player of the tournament for you?

Farrell: Look, I’m happy that Kane Williamson got the official nod, and he’s a worthy winner. I think it’s a toss-up between him and Shakib Al Hasan, who was brilliant as ever. Who hit the most boundaries?Fernando: Shakib Al Hasan, whose runs and wickets in the tournament have confirmed him as the first all-time great cricketer from Bangladesh.Ugra: Shakib – numbers and presence and impact. A big man for a big occasion. How Bangladesh will miss him when he’s gone. Muthu: Shakib. Asking for what he wanted. Proving that he deserved it. And showing the entire world that he could get into a team on his batting alone.Krishnaswamy: Shakib. He has always been a top allrounder, but at this World Cup his batting reached new heights. Great batsmen know their strengths and weaknesses intimately, and at one point work out a method by which they can churn out fifties on autopilot. We see Virat Kohli bat like that all the time, and Shakib raised his game to that level.Gollapudi: Jofra Archer.Isam: Shakib, the third highest run getter, with 606 runs, at the tournament’s highest average, 86.57. He was the joint second-highest wicket-taker among spinners with 11 wickets. Nobody in the World Cup’s history has ever taken more than ten wickets and scored 400-plus runs. He delivered at a level never before seen by any allrounder in this tournament.Dobell: Nobody could argue with the choice of Shakib, for his all-round excellence, or Williamson for his grace and cool under pressure. But I’d have given it to Stokes: that’s what redemption looks like.Gardner: Ben Stokes. Colossal.Samiuddin: Jofra Archer. Quite simply because he transformed the England bowling attack.Miller: Shakib was stunning. With bat or ball in hand, he was in total control of his game at all times, and as a consequence no contest ever seemed entirely out of Bangladesh’s reach. Thanks to his guiding hand, they were by a distance the best of the non-semi-finalists, no matter what the World Cup table tells you. But Kane Williamson was a hugely worthy winner, for his class in every innings and his grace in (non-)defeat.Alex Carey: kid’s good off either foot•Getty Images

Who was the breakout star?

Gollapudi: Archer, but also Rishabh Pant.Gardner: You can’t get away from Jofra Archer. Literally – he will hunt you down, bounce you at 90mph and then bamboozle you with a knuckleball. The kid is fi-yah. Muthu: Alex Carey. Never seen a kid be so good off both front and back foot. Never seen a kid shrug off a blow to the helmet like that. Gonna see this kid for years to come.Ugra: Nicholas Pooran, whose heady chase with Fabian Allen in a dead rubber against Sri Lanka became the promise of tomorrow for West Indies cricket, besides their dynamo power batting and explosive bowling. Now if only the three could meet every time in every game.Krishnaswamy: Liton Das. He has been around for a few years, and it’s hard to call his tournament a breakthrough, since he only played one real innings of substance – 94 not out against West Indies – but what an innings it was, filled with the most sublime strokeplay. With the ability he has, he surely will blossom into a mainstay across formats and rewrite some of Bangladesh’s batting records.Miller: Jofra Archer has been everything we were promised, and more. Viciously quick but extraordinarily cunning as well. That knuckleball to Glenn Maxwell in the semi-final was pure witchcraft.Fernando: Jofra Archer and Lockie Ferguson were incredible to watch right through the tournament. Let’s hope they stay injury-free.Isam: Archer will become one of the brightest stars in world cricket. His languid action spewing high pace has batsmen jumping around already, and like Brett Lee, he is a fast bowler who smiles more than he snarls. A crowd favourite, and a legend in the making.Farrell: Jofra Archer has still only played a handful of ODIs. How crazy is that? Looking forward to seeing a lot more of Shaheen Afridi and Nicholas Pooran too.Kane get you out of my head: The finish feels unfair to New Zealand and throws a shadow over England’s hard-fought win•Getty Images

What was the biggest disappointment?

Muthu: Laws. Yeah, don’t make me talk about this. I’ll use bad words.Dobell: The finish. It feels untidy. It doesn’t feel fair to New Zealand, who were simply unlucky, or England, who deserve unstinting praise but may now not receive it because of the manner in which their victory was achieved. I’d have been happy to see the trophy shared. Might it not have set quite a good precedent? Might it not have shown that, however hard sides play, it’s not all about winning and losing?Samiuddin: Not that much, though I guess that rain had such an effect on some sides – good or bad – is probably one thing. The controversies around the final, to a degree, but, personally, the drama of such a great game, a great game as the final of the game’s showpiece event, overshadows those.Farrell: Not seeing as many teams as we did in the last World Cup. Also, the outrageous amount of plastic and needless waste at venues. We need to be better.Krishnaswamy: Ireland, Zimbabwe, Scotland and Netherlands were playing extremely competitive ODI cricket in the lead-up to the World Cup and during the tournament too. At least two of them should have been at the World Cup.Miller: The lack of free-to-air coverage. It’s old-hat, I know, and we’ve dealt with it in our very English manner for the past 15 years. But the incredulity of my colleagues from overseas brought it home to me, just how isolated and irrelevant English cricket has allowed itself to become in the past generation. The euphoria around the final confirmed that the latent fans are still out there somewhere.Isam: Forget free-to-air for a minute. The real culprit for a World Cup was the organisers’ lack of effort to make more people aware about the event in the host cities. A few posters with a trophy and a sponsor’s name at the bottom hardly suggested that a World Cup was happening in the neighbourhood.Ugra: West Indies’ tailspin in the event after a Sheldon Cottrell-like statement of arrival with beating Pakistan.Gardner: Afghanistan were much poorer than I thought they would be. And the wet weather in the second week was untimely.Let’s talk about six, baby: Kumar Dharmasena controversial decision in the final is going to be a conversation piece for a long time to come•Getty Images

What was the biggest facepalm moment?

Samiuddin: Easy – the appointment of Kumar Dharmasena for the final after his semi-final performance. And that blunder actually happened earlier in the year, when they awarded him Umpire of the Year, which meant that, as long as Sri Lanka weren’t in the final, Dharmasena would likely be standing, because if the ICC don’t pick their own best umpire for their showpiece game then it doesn’t put their award in a great light. So they did and… well.Isam: The overthrows off Stokes’ bat, which, firstly, should have made the ball dead (had the ICC been serious about such intricate details), and the resultant six runs which should have actually been five runs, had the umpires, already equipped with so much technology, observed things better.Gollapudi: Chris Gayle raising his bat while walking out, even as West Indies were being knocked out of the World Cup.Gardner: South Africa’s entire campaign, but in particular how many self-owns they managed in the must-win game against New Zealand at Edgbaston.Ugra: Shai Hope missing a stumping off Dhoni. And Boult, Boult!, stepping on the boundary rope in the final. When Boult loses his bearings, it is a sign that that the match is going to go England’s way. No matter how, the World Cup was England’s from that moment on.Farrell: When Gulbadin Naib brought himself on to bowl at the death against Pakistan. Muthu: Once bad boy Kohli turning goody-goody and walking when he wasn’t even out. They should make that dismissal into an emoji.Krishnaswamy: Shimron Hetmyer and Chris Gayle going for risky hits, ignoring the available singles in the must-win game against New Zealand, leading to a collapse. We’ll remember what Carlos Brathwaite did next, but the bigger takeaway for West Indies will be how their heavily T20-influenced approach failed them in two winnable games: this one and the chase against Australia.Miller: It’s not so much a facepalm as a jaw-drop. Of all the “uncontrollables” that turned the final England’s way, Trent Boult’s rope-tread was the clincher. After the poise he showed to end Brathwaite’s rampage at Old Trafford, it was an error that will haunt him for evermore.Dobell: It actually happened a bit before the start of the tournament. I was having a coffee with Moeen Ali. An Australian guy came over and said, “Ah, look, I’m an Australian but I just want to say I really admire you and the way you bat all day. How about a selfie?” I caught Moeen’s eye at this point. He looked bemused. “I bowl all day sometimes,” he said. “Batting… hmm, not so much.” Anyway, it became pretty apparent the Australian fella thought Moeen was Hashim Amla. He probably has that selfie of him and “Hashim” on Facebook now.

'What money can do!' – Wales manager Craig Bellamy sends jibe at Wrexham after naming three players from Ryan Reynolds and Rob McElhenney's club for September squad

Wales boss Craig Bellamy took a playful jibe at Wrexham after including three of their stars in the national team squad for their upcoming World Cup qualifiers next month. The Red Dragons have spent heavily in the summer transfer window following their third consecutive promotion to the Championship this season. The Ryan Reynolds and Rob McElhennery-owned club have added 10 new players to their roster.

  • Three Wrexham players named in Wales squad
  • Bellamy took a jibe at Wrexham
  • Wrexham face Millwall on Saturday
Follow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱
  • WHAT HAPPENED?

    Wales boss Bellamy named goalkeeper Danny Ward and forwards Nathan Broadhead and Kieffer Moore in the national team squad as he announced a 25-man roster for their upcoming international matches next month. Wales will first face Kazakhstan in a World Cup qualifier on September 4 and then face Canada in an international friendly five days later.

  • Advertisement

  • WHAT BELLAMY SAID

    Shortly after announcing the squad, the former Liverpool and Manchester City forward took a cheeky jibe at the Red Dragons as he told reporters: "What money can do, huh? It always helps of course, with the more Welsh players can be together. There aren't similarities to how we play with Wales and how Wrexham play. They're two different ways, and there's no right or wrong way with this.

    "But for instance, with Kieffer, the way Wrexham play will definitely suit him, and I feel that when I've watched him with Wrexham, you can see that. With Broady, it'd be nice for him to get a consistent run of playing week in, week out. And to me, with the fee Wrexham paid, it looks like he will get that. That leaves me excited with Broady, because I believe there's a really good footballer there. He has the benchmarks, especially with intensity, to really flourish there."

  • Getty Images Sport

    THE BIGGER PICTURE

    Bellamy added: "Wardy has worked hard to get to where he has as well. He had a tricky spell last year but came through it mentally as well. I'm delighted to see him playing for Wrexham as well as it's his club.

    "It's just the journey of Wrexham and I think we're all captivated by it. It's been amazing for Welsh football, and hopefully, in a number of years, we'll see young players coming through that. Whether it's Swansea, Newport, Cardiff or Wrexham, the better they do, then the better chance we have of being a stronger nation in football, so it's always positive."

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • Getty Images Sport

    WHAT NEXT FOR WREXHAM?

    Before heading out for national duty, the Welsh trio will feature for the club in their upcoming Championship fixture against Millwall on Saturday.

Ederson agrees €14m Fenerbahce transfer as Man City close in on PSG goalkeeper Gianluigi Donnarumma

Ederson has reportedly agreed a move to Turkish giants Fenerbahce, which will open the door for Gianluigi Donnarumma to complete his transfer to Manchester City from Paris Saint-Germain. Fenerbahce are set to fork out around €14 million (£12m/$16m) to sign Ederson, who is leaving City after eight trophy-laden years.

  • Ederson set to join Fenerbahce
  • City going after PSG's Donnarumma
  • Ederson has agreed personal terms
Follow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱
  • Getty Images

    WHAT HAPPENED?

    According to , Ederson is on the verge of signing for Fenerbahce after City verbally sanctioned his transfer for a fee in the region of €14m. The report adds that Ederson's agent Jorge Mendes has thrashed out personal terms with Fenerbahce sporting director Devin Ozek.

  • Advertisement

  • THE BIGGER PICTURE

    According to , as Ederson is preparing to exit Etihad Stadium, the Cityzens are working behind the scenes to secure a transfer for Paris Saint-Germain's out-of-favour goalkeeper Donnarumma. The Ligue 1 giants expect City to complete all the formalities and finalise the Italian's transfer before Monday's deadline. 

  • DID YOU KNOW?

    Since moving from Benfica to City in 2017, Ederson has made 372 appearances across all competitions and won multiple trophies, including six Premier League crowns and the Champions League. However, since the start of the summer transfer window, the Selecao star has been linked with a move away from the Premier League side. Donnarumma, on the other hand, went public with his decision to quit PSG after falling down the pecking order under Luis Enrique. 

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • Getty Images

    WHAT NEXT FOR MANCHESTER CITY?

    City will now work on the transfer fee for Donnarumma, with it reported that they are reluctant to match PSG's initial asking price of €50 million (£43.2m/$58.3m) for the Italian custodian.

Inter Miami's Luis Suarez suspended for six games while Sergio Busquets, Tomas Aviles and Seattle Sounders' coach Steven Lenhart also disciplined for Leagues Cup brawl

The Leagues Cup disciplinary committee announces multiple-game suspensions in wake of brawl between Inter Miami and Seattle Sounders

  • Suarez gets a six-game suspension 
  • Lenart gets a five-game ban
  • Suspension applies only to Leagues Cup

Get the MLS Season Pass today!Stream games now

  • WHAT HAPPENED?

    Five days after a post-match brawl between the Seattle Sounders and Inter Miami, the Leagues Cup disciplinary committee on Friday announced a series of multi-game suspensions.

    Inter Miami's Luis Suarez received the stiffest penalty – a six-game suspension after spitting at a Sounders staff member. Miami's Sergio Busquets got two games due to violent conduct and Tomas Aviles three games, also for violent conduct. Seattle assistant coach Steven Lenhart received a five-game ban for violent conduct. 

    These suspensions only apply to the Leagues Cup competition. Tom Bogert reported that MLS could hand out its own suspensions.

    According to the Leagues Cup's statement, all parties will receive undisclosed fines, as well.

  • Advertisement

  • Getty Images Sport

    THE BIGGER PICTURE

    Miami and Seattle resume MLS play on Sept. 13. Both Suarez and Busquets' contracts expire at the end of this MLS campaign, and there has been speculation they could retire after the season.

  • DID YOU KNOW?

    Suarez's latest ban continues a career-wide trend of controversial incidents, including a 10-match ban for biting Branislav Ivanovic in the Premier League in 2013, a nine-match international suspension for biting Giorgio Chiellini at the 2014 World Cup, and an eight-game ban for racially abusing Patrice Evra.

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • WHAT'S NEXT?

    Miami and Seattle will return to action in eight days following the international break.

What's happening with Man Utd's new stadium? CEO Omar Berrada provides update on Old Trafford plans in latest financial update

Manchester United CEO Omar Berrada has delivered an update on the club's ambitious plans to build a new £2 billion ($2.7bn) stadium.

Article continues below

Article continues below

Article continues below

  • Man Utd shared fiscal results of third quarter
  • Recorded an operating profit of £0.7m in Q3 of 2024

  • Berrada remains bullish about infrastructure upgrades
Follow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱
  • WHAT HAPPENED?

    In their latest financial report, United revealed strong progress, with revenues up 17.4% and a marked recovery in profitability. The club recorded an operating profit of £0.7 million in the quarter – a significant swing from a £66.2m loss during the same period last year. Adjusted EBITDA surged to £51.2m, a 274% increase compared to Q3 2024 projections.

  • Advertisement

  • AFP

    THE BIGGER PICTURE

    During the earnings call, CEO Omar Berrada emphasised a cautious but clear strategy. He acknowledged the club’s subpar Premier League performance last season and expressed confidence in securing improvements next year. He also highlighted the club's infrastructure commitments, including the Carrington training centre revamp and plans for a new 100,000-seat stadium to anchor development in the Old Trafford area.

  • WHAT BERRADA SAID

    The centrepiece of United’s long-term vision is the planned new stadium. Cost estimates currently stand at £2b ($2.7b), with no formal timeline established yet.

    "We remain focused on infrastructure, with the redevelopment of our Carrington Training Complex continuing and on track, which will be the heart of our club, providing world-class facilities for all our teams and our staff," he said.

    "We have also announced our aspiration to pursue a new 100,000-seat stadium, sitting at the heart of the regeneration of the Old Trafford area, which would be a catalyst for growth and investment in our local community. We are continuing to work with all the relevant stakeholders, including central Government, to support their vision for growth."

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • DID YOU KNOW?

    Acknowledging the need for greater fiscal discipline, United have acted to balance its books. The club has cut roles, stopped offering free lunches, and reduced bonuses to restore profitability. These efforts resulted in a reduced net loss of £2.7m for the quarter, markedly improved from the £71.5m loss previously. United have revised their full-year revenue forecast to £660–670m and raised their adjusted EBITDA guidance to between £180–190m, up from previous estimates of £145–160m.

Liverpool eyeing swoop to sign 27-goal star rivalling Salah for Ballon d’Or

Perhaps with replacing Mohamed Salah in mind, Liverpool have now reportedly set their sights on signing the Egyptian’s greatest rival to win the 2025 Ballon d’Or this summer.

Liverpool eye new forwards as Diaz, Jota and Nunez disappoint

Arne Slot’s debut campaign has gone so well at Anfield that the natural expectancy was that they would, one way or another, find a way past Paris Saint-Germain. For the first time in the Dutchman’s Liverpool career, however, his side’s weaknesses were laid bare up against a PSG side who are simply more complete under Luis Enrique these days.

Not just Nunez: Liverpool star who lost the ball every 3 mins let Slot down

Liverpool exit the Champions League in the last 16 after losing to Paris Saint-Germain on penalties.

1

By
Angus Sinclair

Mar 12, 2025

It was fairly fitting that arguably Europe’s best two sides needed penalties to decide what was a two-legged tie filled to the brim with world class quality and in many ways it summed up Darwin Nunez’s Liverpool career that he was the one who blinked first.

Between Diogo Jota’s frantic yet ineffective performance, Luis Diaz’s mixed display and Nunez’s own frustrating cameo, it became clearer than ever that the Reds need an attacking boost this summer, especially if Salah departs as a free agent.

If that is to be the case – and a disastrous one at that – then those at Anfield must pursue the signature of the Egyptian’s Ballon d’Or rival this summer, having already reportedly set their sights on his potential arrival.

According to Caught Offside, Liverpool are now eyeing a summer swoop to sign Raphinha from Barcelona in a move that would instantly ease their Salah blow and revive their frontline.

FC Barcelona's Raphinha in action with Real Sociedad's MartinZubimendi

Unlike this time last year, however, Barcelona are unlikely to part ways with Brazilian at the first chance they get. In fact, they’re likely to deny any offer at all for the winger’s signature, given how he has exploded into life to become one of Europe’s most lethal players in the current campaign – scoring 27 goals in all competitions.

"Special" Raphinha one of few who could replace Salah

When Michael Edwards and Richard Hughes go searching for a player capable of guaranteeing 20-plus goals a season whilst also taking up the role of main creator, they will struggle to find an extensive list of players able to come close to the levels that Salah has consistently shown. However, if they turn that search towards Spain they may just find one of a select few stars beginning to show similar traits.

League stats 24/25 (via FBref)

Raphinha

Mohamed Salah

Goals

13

27

Assists

7

17

Expected Goals

14.4

22

Key Passes

74

68

Although the numbers show just how unbelievable Salah’s season has been, Raphinha has been no slouch either and remains the Liverpool star’s greatest Ballon d’Or rival – especially after advancing in the Champions League.

At 28 years old, the former Leeds United winger is finally at the absolute peak of his powers and earning deserved praise from Hansi Flick as a result. The Barcelona boss told reporters earlier this season: “He has good dynamics with the ball and he has had an extraordinary match.

“His offensive and defensive dynamics, and his good technique, are something special. I have never had a player like him and he helps us a lot.”

Sergio Aguero explains why Lionel Messi's Inter Miami HAD to be at Club World Cup after FIFA were criticised for including MLS club

Sergio Aguero has explained why Lionel Messi and Inter Miami had to be at the Club World Cup, having received a special invitation from FIFA.

Article continues below

Article continues below

Article continues below

  • Herons form part of event in the United States
  • Messi of obvious appeal to American audience
  • FIFA considered to have made the right choice
Follow GOAL on WhatsApp! 🟢📱
  • WHAT HAPPENED?

    An expanded tournament, which sees a global crown come up for grabs, is heading to the United States. For the first time, 32 teams from across the planet will be competing for the grandest of prizes.

  • Advertisement

  • THE BIGGER PICTURE

    The majority of sides secured qualification courtesy of major trophy triumphs. Inter Miami have, however, been added to the ranks courtesy of Messi's mass appeal. The eight-time Ballon d'Or has previously won the Club World Cup with Barcelona.

    Watch every game of the FIFA Club World Cup live on DAZNStream now

  • Getty Images Sport

    DID YOU KNOW?

    Some have questioned the decision to absorb Inter Miami into a competition that features the likes of Real Madrid, Manchester City, Paris Saint-Germain, Bayern Munich, Boca Juniors and Al-Hilal, but Aguero believes the right decision has been made by organisers.

  • ENJOYED THIS STORY?

    Add GOAL.com as a preferred source on Google to see more of our reporting

  • WHAT SERGIO AGUERO SAID

    The former Argentina international has told FIFA of Messi being involved in an event that will help to build more interest in soccer across America ahead of the 2026 World Cup: "Well, I think this is something that is quite important for Inter Miami, and especially knowing that Leo is there, and I think that for the world as a whole and for the fans, I think it was quite important that Inter Miami be included, too, because by now, we know that Messi is… Although it may be painful for some, he is one of the players that everyone wants to see.

    "So, I think that it will be great to see Inter Miami compete against the other teams, and especially see the Inter Miami version of Messi, who is accomplishing everything now in MLS, and they won a title that for a number of years, or I don't know if they have ever won anything, and I think that for Inter Miami, and Leo most of all, this new challenge, knowing him, he will try to do his very best because he will not want, same as with anything else, to lose at all.

    "And, I think that this calls for caution because you know that when you have Leo in the rival team, even if he has a bad 88 minutes, you know that in those last two minutes, he can smash in a goal, he can score from a free-kick, he can make a play you are not expecting because, ultimately, he is the best player in the world and he is the player that can, at any time, hurt you because he is the best."

Game
Register
Service
Bonus